
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X vs EPYC 9474F

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

EPYC 9474F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9474F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($2,200) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,723) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Storm Peak (2023) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+64%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($2,200) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,723) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 7970X and EPYC 9474F

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 99,152 points. Launch price was $2,499.

EPYC 9474F
The EPYC 9474F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 102,255 points. Launch price was $6,780.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 9474F offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9474F has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9474F — a 25.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X (base: 4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X uses the Storm Peak (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9474F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X scores 99,152 against the EPYC 9474F's 102,255 — a 3.1% lead for the EPYC 9474F. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9474F.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 48 / 96+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+29% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+11% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Storm Peak (2023) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 99,152 | 102,255+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 75,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 24,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9474F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 197.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X) vs 12 (EPYC 9474F). PCIe lanes: 92 (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X) vs 128 (EPYC 9474F) — the EPYC 9474F offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X) and SP5 (EPYC 9474F).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 6 TB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 12+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 92 | 128+39% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9474F). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 7970X targets High-End Workstation, EPYC 9474F targets Data Center / Performance Optimized. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 7970X rivals Xeon w7-2495X; EPYC 9474F rivals Xeon 8461V.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | High-End Workstation | Data Center / Performance Optimized |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X launched at $2499 MSRP, while the EPYC 9474F debuted at $6780. At current prices ($2200 vs $3723), the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is $1523 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X delivers 45.1 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 9474F — making the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X the 48.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7970X | EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499-63% | $6780 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2200-41% | $3723 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.1+64% | 27.5 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















