
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX vs EPYC 9355P

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

EPYC 9355P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9355P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,971.7) | ✅ More affordable ($3,026) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Storm Peak (2023) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+33%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,971.7) | ✅ More affordable ($3,026) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9355P

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,891 points. Launch price was $3,899.

EPYC 9355P
The EPYC 9355P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 97,249 points. Launch price was $2,998.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9355P share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX versus 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9355P — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX (base: 4 GHz vs 3.55 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses the Storm Peak (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9355P uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX scores 95,891 against the EPYC 9355P's 97,249 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 9355P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9355P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+20% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+13% | 3.55 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Storm Peak (2023) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 95,891 | 97,249+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 48,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,669 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,298 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9355P uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX) vs 12 (EPYC 9355P). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX) and SP5 (EPYC 9355P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 6 TB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9355P). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX targets Professional Workstation, EPYC 9355P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X; EPYC 9355P rivals Xeon 6740P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Professional Workstation | Data Center / Single Socket |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX launched at $3899 MSRP, while the EPYC 9355P debuted at $2998. At current prices ($3971.7 vs $3026), the EPYC 9355P is $946 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX delivers 24.1 pts/$ vs 32.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9355P — making the EPYC 9355P the 28.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3899 | $2998-23% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3971.7 | $3026-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.1 | 32.1+33% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















