Sempron 140
VS
Athlon 64 3200+

Sempron 140 vs Athlon 64 3200+

AMD

Sempron 140

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 3200+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2 GHz2001

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Sempron 140 is positioned at rank 864 and the Athlon 64 3200+ is on rank 1118, so the Sempron 140 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 140

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
18229%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
17225%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12506%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3768%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2984%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2611%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1495%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1476%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1344%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1344%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1329%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1293%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1275%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1270%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1258%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
96%
#864
Sempron 140
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
100%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
99%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
99%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
99%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
97%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
97%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
97%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
97%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
96%
#875
A4-3420
MSRP: $65|Avg: $30
96%
#876
Core i5-5675R
MSRP: $339|Avg: $392
96%
#877
Pentium G3470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $130
95%
#878
Core i5-3335S
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
95%
#879
Core i5-3470T
MSRP: $184|Avg: $35
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3200+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
257616%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
243421%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
176744%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
53245%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
42176%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
36896%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
21132%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
20856%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
18990%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
18988%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
18776%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
18269%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
18014%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
17941%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
17779%
#1118
Athlon 64 3200+
MSRP: $417|Avg: $10
100%
#1119
Pentium Extreme Edition 965
MSRP: $999|Avg: $100
97%
#1120
Athlon 64 FX-60
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $1000
97%
#1121
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
96%
#1122
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
93%
#1123
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
91%
#1124
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
85%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
83%
#1126
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
81%
#1127
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
79%
#1128
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
75%
#1129
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
75%
#1130
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
75%
#1131
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
74%
#1132
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
73%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
69%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Sempron 140 (2009) utilizes 45 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightSempron 140Athlon 64 3200+
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sargas (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 3200+ (2001) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightSempron 140Athlon 64 3200+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Sempron 140 and Athlon 64 3200+

AMD

Sempron 140

The Sempron 140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 513 points. Launch price was $40.

AMD

Athlon 64 3200+

The Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $150.

Processing Power

Both the Sempron 140 and Athlon 64 3200+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Sempron 140 versus 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3200+ — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Sempron 140. The Sempron 140 uses the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon 64 3200+ uses Clawhammer (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Sempron 140 scores 513 against the Athlon 64 3200+'s 505 — a 1.6% lead for the Sempron 140. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureSempron 140Athlon 64 3200+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz+35%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512K
Process
45 nm-65%
130 nm
Architecture
Sargas (2009−2011)
Clawhammer (2001−2005)
PassMark
513+2%
505
Geekbench 6 Single
292
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Sempron 140 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 3200+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Sempron 140 versus DDR1-400 on the Athlon 64 3200+ — the Sempron 140 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: AM3,AM2+ (Sempron 140) and Socket 939,Socket 754 (Athlon 64 3200+).

FeatureSempron 140Athlon 64 3200+
Socket
AM3
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066+200%
DDR1-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Sempron 140 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Sempron 140) vs false (Athlon 64 3200+). Primary use case: Sempron 140 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Sempron 140 rivals Celeron 420.

FeatureSempron 140Athlon 64 3200+
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
false
Target Use
Budget