
Sempron 3000+ vs Core Solo T1200

Sempron 3000+

Core Solo T1200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Sempron 3000+ is positioned at rank 971 and the Core Solo T1200 is on rank 1241, so the Sempron 3000+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3000+
Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Sempron 3000+ | Core Solo T1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Sempron 3000+ | Core Solo T1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Sempron 3000+ and Core Solo T1200

Sempron 3000+
The Sempron 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 350 points. Launch price was $50.

Core Solo T1200
The Core Solo T1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 355 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Sempron 3000+ and Core Solo T1200 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3000+ versus 1.5 GHz on the Core Solo T1200 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Sempron 3000+. The Sempron 3000+ uses the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Core Solo T1200 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Sempron 3000+ scores 350 against the Core Solo T1200's 355 — a 1.4% lead for the Core Solo T1200. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Sempron 3000+ | Core Solo T1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz+20% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 128 kB | 2 MB+1500% |
| Process | 130 nm | 65 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Palermo (2001−2005) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| PassMark | 350 | 355+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Sempron 3000+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Solo T1200 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Sempron 3000+ | Core Solo T1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | BGA479 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












