
Sempron LE-1200 vs Athlon XP 3000+

Sempron LE-1200

Athlon XP 3000+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Sempron LE-1200 is positioned at rank 929 and the Athlon XP 3000+ is on rank 1138, so the Sempron LE-1200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Sempron LE-1200
Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 3000+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Sempron LE-1200 | Athlon XP 3000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sparta (2007) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Barton (2001−2004) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Sempron LE-1200 | Athlon XP 3000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Sempron LE-1200 and Athlon XP 3000+

Sempron LE-1200
The Sempron LE-1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

Athlon XP 3000+
The Athlon XP 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $78.
Processing Power
Both the Sempron LE-1200 and Athlon XP 3000+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Sempron LE-1200 versus 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 3000+ — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 3000+. The Sempron LE-1200 uses the Sparta (2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon XP 3000+ uses Barton (2001−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Sempron LE-1200 scores 405 against the Athlon XP 3000+'s 408 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon XP 3000+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Sempron LE-1200 | Athlon XP 3000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.17 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512 kB |
| Process | 65 nm-50% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Sparta (2007) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| PassMark | 405 | 408 |
Memory & Platform
The Sempron LE-1200 uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon XP 3000+ uses A (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Sempron LE-1200 | Athlon XP 3000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | A |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR-333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 1 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















