Tesla T4 vs GeForce RTX 2060
Tesla T4
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla T4
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 39% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Tesla T4 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-39%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+39%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $1,000 for the Tesla T4, it costs 88% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1058.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1058.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla T4 and GeForce RTX 2060
Tesla T4
The Tesla T4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 585 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tesla T4 scores 10,153 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 39%. The Tesla T4 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Tesla T4) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 8.141 TFLOPS (Tesla T4) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1590 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Tesla T4) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) with 320 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,153 | 14,114+39% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+33% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.141 TFLOPS+26% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | 1680 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+33% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+32% | 1.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40+33% | 30 |
| Tensor Cores | 320+33% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla T4 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The Tesla T4 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Tesla T4) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the Tesla T4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Tesla T4) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (Tesla T4) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Tesla T4) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla T4 draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 78.3% difference. The Tesla T4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Tesla T4) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 76°C vs 72.
| Feature | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-56% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 229mm |
| Height | 69mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 76°C | 72-5% |
| Perf/Watt | 145.0+64% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The Tesla T4 launched at $1880 MSRP and currently averages $1000, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 88% less ($880 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.2 (Tesla T4) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1052.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1880 | $349-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1000 | $120-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.2 | 117.6+1053% |
| Codename | TU104 | TU106 |
| Release | September 13 2018 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #260 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla T4 and GeForce RTX 2060
