Turion 64 ML-28
VS
Core i7-680UM

Turion 64 ML-28 vs Core i7-680UM

AMD

Turion 64 ML-28

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005
VS
Intel

Core i7-680UM

2 Cores4 Thrd18 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 ML-28 is positioned at rank 556 and the Core i7-680UM is on rank 1036, so the Turion 64 ML-28 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 ML-28

#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
98%
#544
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
733%
#545
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
722%
#546
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
663%
#547
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
660%
#548
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
654%
#550
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
632%
#551
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
606%
#552
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
605%
#553
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
588%
#556
Turion 64 ML-28
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-680UM

#1024
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2453%
#1025
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2417%
#1026
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2219%
#1027
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2209%
#1028
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2189%
#1030
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2114%
#1031
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2027%
#1032
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2023%
#1033
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1969%
#1036
Core i7-680UM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
99%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
98%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
97%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
97%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
95%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
94%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
94%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-680UM leads in gaming performance. However, the Turion 64 ML-28 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightTurion 64 ML-28Core i7-680UM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightTurion 64 ML-28Core i7-680UM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 ML-28 and Core i7-680UM

AMD

Turion 64 ML-28

The Turion 64 ML-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,201 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-680UM

The Core i7-680UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,196 points. Launch price was $317.

Processing Power

The Turion 64 ML-28 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i7-680UM offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-680UM has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-28 versus 2.53 GHz on the Core i7-680UM — a 45% clock advantage for the Core i7-680UM. The Turion 64 ML-28 uses the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Core i7-680UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 ML-28 scores 1,201 against the Core i7-680UM's 1,196 — a 0.4% lead for the Turion 64 ML-28. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion 64 ML-28 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-680UM.

FeatureTurion 64 ML-28Core i7-680UM
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
2.53 GHz+58%
Base Clock
1.46 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
90 nm
32 nm-64%
Architecture
Lancaster (2005−2006)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,201
1,196
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion 64 ML-28 uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-680UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureTurion 64 ML-28Core i7-680UM
Socket
754
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0