Turion 64 MT-32 vs Athlon 64 3100+
Turion 64 MT-32
Athlon 64 3100+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 MT-32 is positioned at rank 942 and the Athlon 64 3100+ is on rank 1074, so the Turion 64 MT-32 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 MT-32
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3100+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion 64 MT-32 | Athlon 64 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion 64 MT-32 | Athlon 64 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 MT-32 and Athlon 64 3100+
Turion 64 MT-32
The Turion 64 MT-32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.79 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon 64 3100+
The Athlon 64 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Turion 64 MT-32 and Athlon 64 3100+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.79 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-32 versus 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3100+ — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3100+. The Turion 64 MT-32 uses the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Athlon 64 3100+ uses Lima (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 MT-32 scores 505 against the Athlon 64 3100+'s 475 — a 6.1% lead for the Turion 64 MT-32.
| Feature | Turion 64 MT-32 | Athlon 64 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.79 GHz | 2 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K |
| Process | 90 nm | 65 nm-28% |
| Architecture | Lancaster (2005−2006) | Lima (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 505+6% | 475 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 280 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 280 |
Memory & Platform
The Turion 64 MT-32 uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 3100+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Turion 64 MT-32 | Athlon 64 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Turion 64 MT-32) / AMD-V (Athlon 64 3100+). Primary use case: Athlon 64 3100+ targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 3100+ rivals Celeron D 352.
| Feature | Turion 64 MT-32 | Athlon 64 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion 64 MT-32 and Athlon 64 3100+
