Turion 64 MT-32 vs Atom E3825

Turion 64 MT-32

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.79 GHz2005

Atom E3825

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Turion 64 MT-32

1 / 1

505

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom E3825

2 / 2

525

+4.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 MT-32 is positioned at rank 942 and the Atom E3825 is on rank 626, so the Atom E3825 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 MT-32

#930

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1743%

#931

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1718%

#932

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1577%

#933

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1570%

#934

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1555%

#936

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1502%

#937

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1440%

#938

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1438%

#939

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1399%

#942

Turion 64 MT-32

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#944

Athlon Neo X2 L335

MSRP: $80|Avg: $15

99%

#945

Core i7-3610QE

MSRP: $315|Avg: $105

99%

#948

A8-8600P

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

98%

#949

FX-9800P

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

97%

#951

Celeron 1020E

MSRP: $86|Avg: $20

97%

#954

Core i7-5850EQ

MSRP: $435|Avg: $370

96%

#956

Core i7-4810MQ

MSRP: $378|Avg: $378

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom E3825

#187

Core Ultra 9 288V

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

97%

#613

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

838%

#614

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

826%

#615

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

758%

#616

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

755%

#617

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

748%

#619

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

722%

#620

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

693%

#621

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

691%

#622

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

673%

#626

Atom E3825

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#627

Core i5-1335UE

MSRP: $312|Avg: $312

100%

#637

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

MSRP: $80|Avg: $10

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom E3825 (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Turion 64 MT-32	Atom E3825
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-I (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Turion 64 MT-32 (2005) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Turion 64 MT-32	Atom E3825
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Turion 64 MT-32 Benchmark Check

Atom E3825 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 MT-32 and Atom E3825

Turion 64 MT-32

The Turion 64 MT-32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.79 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

Atom E3825

The Atom E3825 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $73.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion 64 MT-32 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Atom E3825 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom E3825 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.79 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-32 versus 1.33 GHz on the Atom E3825 — a 29.5% clock advantage for the Turion 64 MT-32. The Turion 64 MT-32 uses the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Atom E3825 uses Bay Trail-I (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 MT-32 scores 505 against the Atom E3825's 525 — a 3.9% lead for the Atom E3825. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Turion 64 MT-32	Atom E3825
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.79 GHz+35%	1.33 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	90 nm	22 nm-76%
Architecture	Lancaster (2005−2006)	Bay Trail-I (2013)
PassMark	505	525+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion 64 MT-32 uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom E3825 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.