Turion 64 X2 TL-56 vs Celeron J4105
Turion 64 X2 TL-56
Celeron J4105
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 X2 TL-56 is positioned at rank 139 and the Celeron J4105 is on rank 900, so the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 X2 TL-56
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J4105
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion 64 X2 TL-56 | Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Trinidad / Tyler (2007) / 90/65 nm) | ✨ Modern (Goldmont Plus (2017) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion 64 X2 TL-56 | Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 X2 TL-56 and Celeron J4105
Turion 64 X2 TL-56
The Turion 64 X2 TL-56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Trinidad / Tyler (2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90/65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,835 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron J4105
The Celeron J4105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,820 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
The Turion 64 X2 TL-56 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J4105 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4105 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4105 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Celeron J4105. The Turion 64 X2 TL-56 uses the Trinidad / Tyler (2007) architecture (90/65 nm), while the Celeron J4105 uses Goldmont Plus (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 scores 2,835 against the Celeron J4105's 2,820 — a 0.5% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-56.
| Feature | Turion 64 X2 TL-56 | Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz+39% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB (total)+300% |
| Process | 90/65 nm | 14 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Trinidad / Tyler (2007) | Goldmont Plus (2017) |
| PassMark | 2,835 | 2,820 |
Memory & Platform
The Turion 64 X2 TL-56 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron J4105 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Turion 64 X2 TL-56 | Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | FCBGA1090 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 6 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-56) / true (Celeron J4105). The Celeron J4105 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4105 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.
| Feature | Turion 64 X2 TL-56 | Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion 64 X2 TL-56 and Celeron J4105
