Turion 64 X2 TL-64 vs Xeon L5335

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 vs Xeon L5335 Performance Spectrum

Turion 64 X2 TL-64

2 / 2

1,726

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L5335

4 / 4

1,737

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 vs Xeon L5335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 vs Xeon L5335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Turion 64 X2 TL-64

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 50W, a 49W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,726 vs 1,737).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon L5335, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon L5335

2007

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $380 MSRP, while Turion 64 X2 TL-64 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌4900% higher power demand at 50W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon L5335 better than Turion 64 X2 TL-64?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5335 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Turion 64 X2 TL-64 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L5335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon L5335 is the better buy right now. Xeon L5335 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $380 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Turion 64 X2 TL-64 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon L5335 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 vs Xeon L5335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Turion 64 X2 TL-64

The Turion 64 X2 TL-64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Trinidad (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,726 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon L5335

The Xeon L5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 August 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,737 points. Launch price was $380.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion 64 X2 TL-64 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon L5335 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon L5335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-64 versus 2 GHz on the Xeon L5335 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Turion 64 X2 TL-64. The Turion 64 X2 TL-64 uses the Trinidad (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon L5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 X2 TL-64 scores 1,726 against the Xeon L5335's 1,737 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon L5335.

Feature	Turion 64 X2 TL-64	Xeon L5335
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB (total)+300%
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Trinidad (2006−2007)	Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,726	1,737

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion 64 X2 TL-64 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L5335 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.