Turion II Neo K685
VS
Core 2 Duo T5270

Turion II Neo K685 vs Core 2 Duo T5270

AMD

Turion II Neo K685

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T5270

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion II Neo K685 is positioned at rank 473 and the Core 2 Duo T5270 is on rank 47, so the Core 2 Duo T5270 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion II Neo K685

#461
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
618%
#462
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
609%
#463
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
559%
#464
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
557%
#465
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
551%
#467
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
533%
#468
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
511%
#469
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
510%
#470
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
496%
#473
Turion II Neo K685
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#488
Processor U300
MSRP: $193|Avg: $180
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5270

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
100%
#35
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
206%
#36
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
203%
#37
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
186%
#38
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
185%
#39
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
183%
#41
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
177%
#42
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
170%
#43
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
170%
#44
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
165%
#47
Core 2 Duo T5270
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Turion II Neo K685 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo T5270 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightTurion II Neo K685Core 2 Duo T5270
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Geneva (2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightTurion II Neo K685Core 2 Duo T5270
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion II Neo K685 and Core 2 Duo T5270

AMD

Turion II Neo K685

The Turion II Neo K685 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,424 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5270

The Core 2 Duo T5270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,427 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Turion II Neo K685 and Core 2 Duo T5270 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Turion II Neo K685 versus 1.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5270 — a 25% clock advantage for the Turion II Neo K685. The Turion II Neo K685 uses the Geneva (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5270 uses Merom-2048 (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Turion II Neo K685 scores 1,424 against the Core 2 Duo T5270's 1,427 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5270.

FeatureTurion II Neo K685Core 2 Duo T5270
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz+29%
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Geneva (2010)
Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,424
1,427
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion II Neo K685 uses the S1g4 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5270 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureTurion II Neo K685Core 2 Duo T5270
Socket
S1g4
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1