Turion II Ultra M620
VS
Core 2 Duo T9300

Turion II Ultra M620 vs Core 2 Duo T9300

AMD

Turion II Ultra M620

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T9300

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion II Ultra M620 is positioned at rank 381 and the Core 2 Duo T9300 is on rank 176, so the Core 2 Duo T9300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion II Ultra M620

#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
98%
#369
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
529%
#370
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
521%
#371
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
478%
#372
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
476%
#373
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
472%
#375
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
455%
#376
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
437%
#377
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
436%
#378
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
424%
#381
Turion II Ultra M620
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#391
Core i5-1145GRE
MSRP: $362|Avg: N/A
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T9300

#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
99%
#164
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
351%
#165
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
346%
#166
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
318%
#167
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
316%
#168
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
314%
#170
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
303%
#171
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
290%
#172
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
290%
#173
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
282%
#176
Core 2 Duo T9300
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Core 2 Duo T9300 shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightTurion II Ultra M620Core 2 Duo T9300
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Caspian (2009) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightTurion II Ultra M620Core 2 Duo T9300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion II Ultra M620 and Core 2 Duo T9300

AMD

Turion II Ultra M620

The Turion II Ultra M620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,665 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T9300

The Core 2 Duo T9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,670 points. Launch price was $316.

Processing Power

Both the Turion II Ultra M620 and Core 2 Duo T9300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Turion II Ultra M620 versus 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9300 — identical boost frequencies. The Turion II Ultra M620 uses the Caspian (2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T9300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Turion II Ultra M620 scores 1,665 against the Core 2 Duo T9300's 1,670 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T9300.

FeatureTurion II Ultra M620Core 2 Duo T9300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Caspian (2009)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,665
1,670
Geekbench 6 Multi
432
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion II Ultra M620 uses the S1g3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T9300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureTurion II Ultra M620Core 2 Duo T9300
Socket
S1g3
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Turion II Ultra M620) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo T9300). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T9300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T9300 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.

FeatureTurion II Ultra M620Core 2 Duo T9300
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget