CPU
GPU
Turion Neo X2 L625
Celeron M 743
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion Neo X2 L625 is positioned at rank 513 and the Celeron M 743 is on rank 1029, so the Turion Neo X2 L625 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion Neo X2 L625
Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 743
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion Neo X2 L625 | Celeron M 743 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Congo (2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion Neo X2 L625 | Celeron M 743 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron M 743
Turion Neo X2 L625
The Turion Neo X2 L625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,313 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron M 743
The Celeron M 743 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA965. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
The Turion Neo X2 L625 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 743 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Turion Neo X2 L625 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Turion Neo X2 L625 versus 1.3 GHz on the Celeron M 743 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Turion Neo X2 L625. The Turion Neo X2 L625 uses the Congo (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron M 743 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Turion Neo X2 L625 scores 1,313 against the Celeron M 743's 1,324 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron M 743.
| Feature | Turion Neo X2 L625 | Celeron M 743 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz+23% | 1.3 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Congo (2009) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,313 | 1,324 |
Memory & Platform
The Turion Neo X2 L625 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M 743 uses BGA965 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Turion Neo X2 L625 | Celeron M 743 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | ASB1 | BGA965 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron M 743
