Turion X2 RM-70
VS
Core i3-540

Turion X2 RM-70 vs Core i3-540

AMD

Turion X2 RM-70

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core i3-540

2 Cores4 Thrd73 WWMax: 0.07 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion X2 RM-70 is positioned at rank 424 and the Core i3-540 is on rank 970, so the Turion X2 RM-70 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 RM-70

#411
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
566%
#412
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
557%
#413
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
512%
#414
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
509%
#415
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
505%
#417
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
487%
#418
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
467%
#419
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
467%
#420
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
454%
#424
Turion X2 RM-70
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#425
Celeron 2981U
MSRP: $137|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-540

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26688%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
25217%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
18310%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5516%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4369%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3822%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2189%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2161%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1967%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1967%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1945%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1893%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1866%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1859%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1842%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
100%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
99%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
99%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
99%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
97%
#976
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
96%
#977
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
96%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
94%
#979
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
94%
#980
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
94%
#981
Core i5-2405S
MSRP: $309|Avg: $120
94%
#982
Celeron 420
MSRP: $39|Avg: $15
93%
#983
Athlon II X4 615e
MSRP: $186|Avg: $30
93%
#984
Athlon X2 BE-2350
MSRP: $90|Avg: $10
93%
#985
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Turion X2 RM-70 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i3-540 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightTurion X2 RM-70Core i3-540
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightTurion X2 RM-70Core i3-540
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion X2 RM-70 and Core i3-540

AMD

Turion X2 RM-70

The Turion X2 RM-70 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,556 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-540

The Core i3-540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,554 points. Launch price was $45.

Processing Power

The Turion X2 RM-70 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-540's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-70 versus 0.07 GHz on the Core i3-540 — a 186.5% clock advantage for the Turion X2 RM-70. The Turion X2 RM-70 uses the Puma (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-540 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Turion X2 RM-70 scores 1,556 against the Core i3-540's 1,554 — a 0.1% lead for the Turion X2 RM-70. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion X2 RM-70 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-540.

FeatureTurion X2 RM-70Core i3-540
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2 GHz+2757%
0.07 GHz
Base Clock
3.06 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Puma (2008−2009)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,556
1,554
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion X2 RM-70 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-540 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureTurion X2 RM-70Core i3-540
Socket
S1
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0