Turion X2 RM-72 vs Athlon X2 QL-64

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion X2 RM-72 is positioned at rank 398 and the Athlon X2 QL-64 is on rank 665, so the Turion X2 RM-72 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 RM-72

#120

Core i7-11850HE

MSRP: $400|Avg: $75

98%

#386

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

541%

#387

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

533%

#388

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

489%

#389

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

487%

#390

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

483%

#392

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

466%

#393

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

447%

#394

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

446%

#395

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

434%

#398

Turion X2 RM-72

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 QL-64

#653

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

909%

#654

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

896%

#655

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

822%

#656

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

818%

#657

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

811%

#659

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

783%

#660

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

751%

#661

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

750%

#662

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

730%

#665

Athlon X2 QL-64

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

100%

#666

Core 3 N350

MSRP: $225|Avg: $220

100%

#668

FX-7500

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Turion X2 RM-72 shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.

Insight	Turion X2 RM-72	Athlon X2 QL-64
Gaming	Balanced gaming performance	Balanced gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Lion (2008−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Turion X2 RM-72	Athlon X2 QL-64
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Turion X2 RM-72 Benchmark Check

Athlon X2 QL-64 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion X2 RM-72 and Athlon X2 QL-64

Turion X2 RM-72

The Turion X2 RM-72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,627 points. Launch price was $69.

Athlon X2 QL-64

The Athlon X2 QL-64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,614 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Turion X2 RM-72 and Athlon X2 QL-64 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-72 versus 2.1 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-64 — identical boost frequencies. The Turion X2 RM-72 uses the Puma (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon X2 QL-64 uses Lion (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Turion X2 RM-72 scores 1,627 against the Athlon X2 QL-64's 1,614 — a 0.8% lead for the Turion X2 RM-72. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Turion X2 RM-72	Athlon X2 QL-64
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Puma (2008−2009)	Lion (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,627	1,614