Turion X2 RM-72
VS
Core i5-2557M

Turion X2 RM-72 vs Core i5-2557M

AMD

Turion X2 RM-72

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core i5-2557M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion X2 RM-72 is positioned at rank 398 and the Core i5-2557M is on rank 36, so the Core i5-2557M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 RM-72

#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
98%
#386
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
541%
#387
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
533%
#388
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
489%
#389
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
487%
#390
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
483%
#392
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
466%
#393
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
447%
#394
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
446%
#395
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
434%
#398
Turion X2 RM-72
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2557M

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
88%
#24
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
181%
#25
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
179%
#26
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
164%
#27
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
163%
#28
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
162%
#30
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
156%
#31
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
150%
#32
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
150%
#33
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
146%
#36
Core i5-2557M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
96%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
95%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
92%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-2557M leads in gaming performance. However, the Turion X2 RM-72 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightTurion X2 RM-72Core i5-2557M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightTurion X2 RM-72Core i5-2557M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion X2 RM-72 and Core i5-2557M

AMD

Turion X2 RM-72

The Turion X2 RM-72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,627 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-2557M

The Core i5-2557M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,618 points. Launch price was $250.

Processing Power

The Turion X2 RM-72 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-2557M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-72 versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-2557M — a 25% clock advantage for the Core i5-2557M. The Turion X2 RM-72 uses the Puma (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-2557M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Turion X2 RM-72 scores 1,627 against the Core i5-2557M's 1,618 — a 0.6% lead for the Turion X2 RM-72. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion X2 RM-72 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2557M.

FeatureTurion X2 RM-72Core i5-2557M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz
2.7 GHz+29%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Puma (2008−2009)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,627
1,618
Geekbench 6 Single
521
Geekbench 6 Multi
882
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion X2 RM-72 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-2557M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureTurion X2 RM-72Core i5-2557M
Socket
S1
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Turion X2 RM-72) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-2557M). The Core i5-2557M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Turion X2 RM-72 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2557M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-2557M rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.

FeatureTurion X2 RM-72Core i5-2557M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget