Turion X2 RM-76 vs Core 2 Duo SP7500
Turion X2 RM-76
Core 2 Duo SP7500
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion X2 RM-76 is positioned at rank 349 and the Core 2 Duo SP7500 is on rank 85, so the Core 2 Duo SP7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 RM-76
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SP7500
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion X2 RM-76 | Core 2 Duo SP7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Griffin (2008−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion X2 RM-76 | Core 2 Duo SP7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion X2 RM-76 and Core 2 Duo SP7500
Turion X2 RM-76
The Turion X2 RM-76 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Griffin (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,770 points. Launch price was $69.
Core 2 Duo SP7500
The Core 2 Duo SP7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,766 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Turion X2 RM-76 and Core 2 Duo SP7500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-76 versus 1.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SP7500 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Turion X2 RM-76. The Turion X2 RM-76 uses the Griffin (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SP7500 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Turion X2 RM-76 scores 1,770 against the Core 2 Duo SP7500's 1,766 — a 0.2% lead for the Turion X2 RM-76.
| Feature | Turion X2 RM-76 | Core 2 Duo SP7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz+44% | 1.6 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Griffin (2008−2009) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,770 | 1,766 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion X2 RM-76 and Core 2 Duo SP7500
