Turion X2 RM-76 vs Xeon E5405

Turion X2 RM-76 vs Xeon E5405 Performance Spectrum

Turion X2 RM-76

2 / 2

1,770

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5405

4 / 4

1,753

0.0%

Celeron P4600

Celeron Dual-Core T3100

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Turion X2 RM-76 vs Xeon E5405 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Turion X2 RM-76 vs Xeon E5405: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Turion X2 RM-76

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 80W, a 79W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5405, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon E5405

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,753 vs 1,770).
❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Turion X2 RM-76 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌7900% higher power demand at 80W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion X2 RM-76 better than Xeon E5405?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5405 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Turion X2 RM-76 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion X2 RM-76 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion X2 RM-76 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion X2 RM-76 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5405 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Turion X2 RM-76 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $209 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5405 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion X2 RM-76 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Turion X2 RM-76 vs Xeon E5405 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Turion X2 RM-76

The Turion X2 RM-76 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Griffin (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,770 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5405

The Xeon E5405 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,753 points. Launch price was $209.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion X2 RM-76 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5405 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5405 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-76 versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5405 — a 14% clock advantage for the Turion X2 RM-76. The Turion X2 RM-76 uses the Griffin (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon E5405 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Turion X2 RM-76 scores 1,770 against the Xeon E5405's 1,753 — a 1% lead for the Turion X2 RM-76.

Feature	Turion X2 RM-76	Xeon E5405
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+15%	2 GHz
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	12 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB (total)+500%
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Griffin (2008−2009)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	1,770	1,753

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion X2 RM-76 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5405 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.