Core 2 Duo SP7500 vs Turion X2 RM-76
Core 2 Duo SP7500
Turion X2 RM-76
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo SP7500 is positioned at rank 85 and the Turion X2 RM-76 is on rank 349, so the Core 2 Duo SP7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SP7500
Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 RM-76
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo SP7500 | Turion X2 RM-76 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Griffin (2008−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo SP7500 | Turion X2 RM-76 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo SP7500 and Turion X2 RM-76
Core 2 Duo SP7500
The Core 2 Duo SP7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,766 points. Launch price was $249.
Turion X2 RM-76
The Turion X2 RM-76 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Griffin (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,770 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo SP7500 and Turion X2 RM-76 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SP7500 versus 2.3 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-76 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Turion X2 RM-76. The Core 2 Duo SP7500 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion X2 RM-76 uses Griffin (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SP7500 scores 1,766 against the Turion X2 RM-76's 1,770 — a 0.2% lead for the Turion X2 RM-76.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SP7500 | Turion X2 RM-76 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.3 GHz+44% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Griffin (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 1,766 | 1,770 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo SP7500 and Turion X2 RM-76
