Core 2 Duo SP7500 vs Pentium Dual Core T2390

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo SP7500 vs Pentium Dual Core T2390 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo SP7500 vs Pentium Dual Core T2390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo SP7500

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,766 vs 1,771).
❌300% higher power demand at 4W vs 1W.

Pentium Dual Core T2390

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 4W, a 3W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo SP7500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Dual Core T2390 better than Core 2 Duo SP7500?

Yes. Pentium Dual Core T2390 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.3% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium Dual Core T2390 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 16.3% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T2390 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium Dual Core T2390 is the better buy right now. Pentium Dual Core T2390 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium Dual Core T2390 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo SP7500 vs Pentium Dual Core T2390 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo SP7500

The Core 2 Duo SP7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,766 points. Launch price was $249.

Pentium Dual Core T2390

The Pentium Dual Core T2390 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,771 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo SP7500 and Pentium Dual Core T2390 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SP7500 versus 1.86 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T2390 — a 15% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual Core T2390. The Core 2 Duo SP7500 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T2390 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SP7500 scores 1,766 against the Pentium Dual Core T2390's 1,771 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T2390.

Feature	Core 2 Duo SP7500	Pentium Dual Core T2390
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.86 GHz+16%
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	1,766	1,771