Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 vs Celeron G1840T
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Celeron G1840T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 is positioned at rank 413 and the Celeron G1840T is on rank 525, so the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1840T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 | Celeron G1840T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 | Celeron G1840T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron G1840T
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,585 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron G1840T
The Celeron G1840T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,576 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron G1840T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron G1840T — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G1840T. The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 uses the Puma (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron G1840T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 scores 1,585 against the Celeron G1840T's 1,576 — a 0.6% lead for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 vs 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1840T.
| Feature | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 | Celeron G1840T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 22 nm-66% |
| Architecture | Puma (2008−2009) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 1,585 | 1,576 |
Memory & Platform
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 uses the S1g2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1840T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 | Celeron G1840T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1g2 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85) / VT-x (Celeron G1840T). The Celeron G1840T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1840T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1840T rivals Pentium G3240T.
| Feature | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 | Celeron G1840T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics (Haswell) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron G1840T
