VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
VS
Core Duo T2500

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 vs Core Duo T2500

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

4 Cores4 Thrd28 WWMax: 1.47 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core Duo T2500

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is positioned at rank 552 and the Core Duo T2500 is on rank 943, so the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
99%
#540
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
727%
#541
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
716%
#542
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
657%
#543
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
654%
#544
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
648%
#546
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
626%
#547
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
600%
#548
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
599%
#549
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
583%
#552
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2500

#931
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1756%
#932
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1730%
#933
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1588%
#934
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1581%
#935
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1567%
#937
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1513%
#938
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1451%
#939
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1448%
#940
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1409%
#943
Core Duo T2500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
99%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#950
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
98%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
97%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Duo T2500 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightVIA Nano QuadCore L4700Core Duo T2500
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (CNQ (2011) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightVIA Nano QuadCore L4700Core Duo T2500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Core Duo T2500

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is manufactured by TSMC. It was released in 12 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the CNQ (2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.47 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,615 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core Duo T2500

The Core Duo T2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,621 points. Launch price was $120.

Processing Power

The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core Duo T2500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 versus 2 GHz on the Core Duo T2500 — a 30.5% clock advantage for the Core Duo T2500 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 uses the CNQ (2011) architecture (40 nm), while the Core Duo T2500 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 scores 1,615 against the Core Duo T2500's 1,621 — a 0.4% lead for the Core Duo T2500.

FeatureVIA Nano QuadCore L4700Core Duo T2500
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.47 GHz
2 GHz+36%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
2 GHz+67%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB+100%
Process
40 nm-38%
65 nm
Architecture
CNQ (2011)
Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark
1,615
1,621
🧠

Memory & Platform

The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 uses the NanoBGA2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Duo T2500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureVIA Nano QuadCore L4700Core Duo T2500
Socket
NanoBGA2
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (VIA Nano QuadCore L4700) / VT-x (Core Duo T2500). Primary use case: Core Duo T2500 targets Mobile.

FeatureVIA Nano QuadCore L4700Core Duo T2500
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile