
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

PRO A6-8570E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is positioned at rank 552 and the PRO A6-8570E is on rank 570, so the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Performance Per Dollar PRO A6-8570E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 | PRO A6-8570E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (CNQ (2011) / 40 nm) | ✨ Modern (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 | PRO A6-8570E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and PRO A6-8570E
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is manufactured by TSMC. It was released in 12 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the CNQ (2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.47 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,615 points. Launch price was $69.

PRO A6-8570E
The PRO A6-8570E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,606 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A6-8570E offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 versus 3.4 GHz on the PRO A6-8570E — a 79.3% clock advantage for the PRO A6-8570E (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 uses the CNQ (2011) architecture (40 nm), while the PRO A6-8570E uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 scores 1,615 against the PRO A6-8570E's 1,606 — a 0.6% lead for the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700.
| Feature | VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 | PRO A6-8570E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.47 GHz | 3.4 GHz+131% |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3 GHz+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1024 kB |
| Process | 40 nm | 28 nm-30% |
| Architecture | CNQ (2011) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| PassMark | 1,615 | 1,606 |
Memory & Platform
The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 uses the NanoBGA2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A6-8570E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 | PRO A6-8570E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | NanoBGA2 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















