Xeon 5120 vs Athlon II Neo K325
Xeon 5120
Athlon II Neo K325
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon 5120 is positioned at rank 857 and the Athlon II Neo K325 is on rank 912, so the Xeon 5120 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 5120
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II Neo K325
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon 5120 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Woodcrest (2006) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Geneva (2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon 5120 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+67%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 5120 and Athlon II Neo K325
Xeon 5120
The Xeon 5120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $45.
Athlon II Neo K325
The Athlon II Neo K325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,111 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon 5120 and Athlon II Neo K325 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Xeon 5120 versus 1.3 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K325 — a 36% clock advantage for the Xeon 5120. The Xeon 5120 uses the Woodcrest (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon II Neo K325 uses Geneva (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 5120 scores 1,115 against the Athlon II Neo K325's 1,111 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon 5120.
| Feature | Xeon 5120 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.87 GHz+44% | 1.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.86 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Woodcrest (2006) | Geneva (2010) |
| PassMark | 1,115 | 1,111 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 736 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,235 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 5120 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II Neo K325 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon 5120 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA771 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon 5120) / AMD-V (Athlon II Neo K325). Primary use case: Athlon II Neo K325 targets Low Power.
| Feature | Xeon 5120 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Low Power |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 5120 launched at $107 MSRP, while the Athlon II Neo K325 debuted at $60. At current prices ($15 vs $25), the Xeon 5120 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 5120 delivers 74.3 pts/$ vs 44.4 pts/$ for the Athlon II Neo K325 — making the Xeon 5120 the 50.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 5120 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107 | $60-44% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-40% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.3+67% | 44.4 |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon 5120 and Athlon II Neo K325
