Xeon 6505P
VS
M4 Max (14 cores)

Xeon 6505P vs M4 Max (14 cores)

Intel

Xeon 6505P

12 Cores24 Thrd150 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2025
VS

M4 Max (14 cores)

14 Cores14 Thrd4 WWMax: 4.51 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6505P

#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
104%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
102%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
100%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
95%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar M4 Max (14 cores)

#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
131%
#203
M4 Max (14 cores)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($563) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 6505P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon 6505PM4 Max (14 cores)
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($563)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The M4 Max (14 cores) ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($563 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon 6505PM4 Max (14 cores)
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($563)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6505P and M4 Max (14 cores)

Intel

Xeon 6505P

The Xeon 6505P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 39,341 points. Launch price was $563.

M4 Max (14 cores)

The M4 Max (14 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 November 2024 (1 year ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.59 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 38,558 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The Xeon 6505P packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the M4 Max (14 cores) offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the M4 Max (14 cores) has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6505P versus 4.51 GHz on the M4 Max (14 cores) — a 9.5% clock advantage for the M4 Max (14 cores) (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.59 GHz). The Xeon 6505P is built on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon 6505P scores 39,341 against the M4 Max (14 cores)'s 38,558 — a 2% lead for the Xeon 6505P.

FeatureXeon 6505PM4 Max (14 cores)
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
14 / 14+17%
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz
4.51 GHz+10%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.59 GHz+18%
L3 Cache
48 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 3 nm
3 nm
Architecture
Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark
39,341+2%
38,558
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6505P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M4 Max (14 cores) uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Xeon 6505P versus 8533 on the M4 Max (14 cores) — the M4 Max (14 cores) supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6505P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon 6505P) vs 0 (M4 Max (14 cores)). PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6505P) vs 0 (M4 Max (14 cores)) — the Xeon 6505P offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA4710 (Xeon 6505P) and Apple M4 (M4 Max (14 cores)).

FeatureXeon 6505PM4 Max (14 cores)
Socket
LGA4710
none
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
6400
8533+33%
Max RAM Capacity
4096+3100%
128
RAM Channels
8
0
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
88
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6505P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6505P) vs VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M4 Max (14 cores)). The M4 Max (14 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple M4 Max GPU (32-core)), while the Xeon 6505P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon 6505P rivals EPYC 9334; M4 Max (14 cores) rivals Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.

FeatureXeon 6505PM4 Max (14 cores)
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Apple M4 Max GPU (32-core)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d (macOS)