PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6505P vs Xeon W-3335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6505P vs Xeon W-3335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6505P

2025

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Costs $867 less on MSRP ($563 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).
✅Delivers 154.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.9 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($563 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3335 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon W-3335

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (39,293 vs 39,341).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 69.9 PassMark/$ ($1,430 MSRP vs $563 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon 6505P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6505P better than Xeon W-3335?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-3335 is ahead with a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6505P pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Xeon 6505P also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6505P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6505P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6505P comes in $867 cheaper on MSRP at $563 MSRP versus $1,430 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W-3335 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 154.3% better value on MSRP (69.9 vs 27.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6505P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 100% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6505P vs Xeon W-3335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6505P

The Xeon 6505P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 39,341 points. Launch price was $563.

Xeon W-3335

The Xeon W-3335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,293 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6505P packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3335 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3335 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6505P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3335 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon 6505P (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon 6505P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon W-3335 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6505P scores 39,341 against the Xeon W-3335's 39,293 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon 6505P. L3 cache: 48 MB (total) on the Xeon 6505P vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3335.

Feature	Xeon 6505P	Xeon W-3335
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	16 / 32+33%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+2%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.4 GHz+55%
L3 Cache	48 MB (total)+100%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 3 nm-70%	10 nm
Architecture	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	39,341	39,293

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6505P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3335 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Xeon 6505P versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3335 — the Xeon 6505P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6505P) vs 64 (Xeon W-3335) — the Xeon 6505P offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA4710 (Xeon 6505P) and W790 (Xeon W-3335).

Feature	Xeon 6505P	Xeon W-3335
Socket	LGA4710	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	6400+100%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88+38%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon 6505P rivals EPYC 9334; Xeon W-3335 rivals EPYC 7402.

Feature	Xeon 6505P	Xeon W-3335
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon 6505P was priced at $563, while the Xeon W-3335 came in at $1430. On launch pricing ($563 vs $1430), Xeon 6505P was $867 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6505P delivers 69.9 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3335 — making the Xeon 6505P the 87.1% better value option.

Feature	Xeon 6505P	Xeon W-3335
MSRP	$563-61%	$1430
Performance per Dollar	69.9+154%	27.5
Release Date	2025	2021

Search Xeon 6505P on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3335 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.