EPYC 7352 vs Xeon 6505P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7352

24 Cores48 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6505P

12 Cores24 Thrd150 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2025

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7352 vs Xeon 6505P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7352

24 / 48

40,370

+2.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon 6505P

12 / 24

39,341

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7352 vs Xeon 6505P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7352 vs Xeon 6505P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7352

2019

Why buy it

✅+2.6% higher PassMark.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6505P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 69.9 PassMark/$ ($1,350 MSRP vs $563 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6505P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6505P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Costs $787 less on MSRP ($563 MSRP vs $1,350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 133.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.9 vs 29.9 PassMark/$ ($563 MSRP vs $1,350 MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 155W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (39,341 vs 40,370).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6505P better than EPYC 7352?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon 6505P is ahead with a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7352 pulls ahead with 2.6% better PassMark. Xeon 6505P also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7352 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.6% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6505P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6505P comes in $787 cheaper on MSRP at $563 MSRP versus $1,350 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7352 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.6% better PassMark. It is also 133.7% better value on MSRP (69.9 vs 29.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6505P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of SP3, 50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7352 vs Xeon 6505P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7352

The EPYC 7352 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,370 points. Launch price was $1,350.

Xeon 6505P

The Xeon 6505P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 39,341 points. Launch price was $563.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7352 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6505P offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7352 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7352 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6505P — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 6505P (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7352 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon 6505P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7352 scores 40,370 against the Xeon 6505P's 39,341 — a 2.6% lead for the EPYC 7352. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7352 vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon 6505P.

Feature	EPYC 7352	Xeon 6505P
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+100%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.1 GHz+28%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+5%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	48 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	40,370+3%	39,341
Cinebench R23 Multi	32,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,112	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,276	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7352 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6505P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7352 versus 6400 on the Xeon 6505P — the Xeon 6505P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7352) vs 88 (Xeon 6505P) — the EPYC 7352 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7352) and LGA4710 (Xeon 6505P).

Feature	EPYC 7352	Xeon 6505P
Socket	SP3	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6505P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7352) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6505P). Primary use case: EPYC 7352 targets High-density Computing / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7352 rivals Xeon Gold 6242; Xeon 6505P rivals EPYC 9334.

Feature	EPYC 7352	Xeon 6505P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	High-density Computing / Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7352 was priced at $1350, while the Xeon 6505P came in at $563. On launch pricing ($1350 vs $563), Xeon 6505P was $787 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7352 delivers 29.9 pts/$ vs 69.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6505P — making the Xeon 6505P the 80.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7352	Xeon 6505P
MSRP	$1350	$563-58%
Performance per Dollar	29.9	69.9+134%
Release Date	2019	2025

Search EPYC 7352 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6505P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.