EPYC 7352 vs Xeon w5-2545

EPYC 7352 vs Xeon w5-2545 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7352

24 / 48

40,370

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon w5-2545

12 / 24

40,782

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7352 vs Xeon w5-2545 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7352 vs Xeon w5-2545: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7352

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 155W instead of 210W, a 55W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-2545 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (40,370 vs 40,782).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 45.9 PassMark/$ ($1,350 MSRP vs $889 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-2545 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w5-2545

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $461 less on MSRP ($889 MSRP vs $1,350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.9 vs 29.9 PassMark/$ ($889 MSRP vs $1,350 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌35.5% higher power demand at 210W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-2545 better than EPYC 7352?

Yes. Xeon w5-2545 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 31.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w5-2545 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 31.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-2545 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w5-2545 is the better buy right now. Xeon w5-2545 comes in $461 cheaper on MSRP at $889 MSRP versus $1,350 MSRP, and it still gives you a 31.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 53.4% better value on MSRP (45.9 vs 29.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-2545 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7352 vs Xeon w5-2545 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7352

The EPYC 7352 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,370 points. Launch price was $1,350.

Xeon w5-2545

The Xeon w5-2545 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 40,782 points. Launch price was $889.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7352 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w5-2545 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7352 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7352 versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon w5-2545 — a 38% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-2545 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 7352 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon w5-2545 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7352 scores 40,370 against the Xeon w5-2545's 40,782 — a 1% lead for the Xeon w5-2545. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7352 vs 30 MB on the Xeon w5-2545.

Feature	EPYC 7352	Xeon w5-2545
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+100%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.7 GHz+47%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+52%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+7%	30 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	40,370	40,782+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	32,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,112	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,276	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7352 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-2545 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7352 versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-2545 — the Xeon w5-2545 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7352 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7352) vs 4 (Xeon w5-2545). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7352) vs 64 (Xeon w5-2545) — the EPYC 7352 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7352) and W790 (Xeon w5-2545).

Feature	EPYC 7352	Xeon w5-2545
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+100%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	8+100%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w5-2545 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w5-2545 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7352) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-2545). Primary use case: EPYC 7352 targets High-density Computing / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7352 rivals Xeon Gold 6242; Xeon w5-2545 rivals Threadripper 7960X.

Feature	EPYC 7352	Xeon w5-2545
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	High-density Computing / Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7352 was priced at $1350, while the Xeon w5-2545 came in at $889. On launch pricing ($1350 vs $889), Xeon w5-2545 was $461 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7352 delivers 29.9 pts/$ vs 45.9 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-2545 — making the Xeon w5-2545 the 42.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7352	Xeon w5-2545
MSRP	$1350	$889-34%
Performance per Dollar	29.9	45.9+54%
Release Date	2019	2024

Search EPYC 7352 on Amazon

Search Xeon w5-2545 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.