EPYC 7352 vs Xeon 6515P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7352

24 Cores48 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6515P

16 Cores32 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7352 vs Xeon 6515P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7352

24 / 48

40,370

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon 6515P

16 / 32

40,720

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7352 vs Xeon 6515P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7352 vs Xeon 6515P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7352

2019

Why buy it

✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6515P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (40,370 vs 40,720).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 72 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 55.0 PassMark/$ ($1,350 MSRP vs $740 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6515P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6515P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+125% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Costs $610 less on MSRP ($740 MSRP vs $1,350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 84.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 55.0 vs 29.9 PassMark/$ ($740 MSRP vs $1,350 MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 155W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6515P better than EPYC 7352?

Yes. Xeon 6515P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6515P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6515P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6515P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6515P comes in $610 cheaper on MSRP at $740 MSRP versus $1,350 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 84.0% better value on MSRP (55.0 vs 29.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6515P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of SP3, 125% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7352 vs Xeon 6515P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7352

The EPYC 7352 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,370 points. Launch price was $1,350.

Xeon 6515P

The Xeon 6515P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 40,720 points. Launch price was $740.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7352 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6515P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7352 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7352 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6515P — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Xeon 6515P (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 7352 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon 6515P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7352 scores 40,370 against the Xeon 6515P's 40,720 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon 6515P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7352 vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6515P.

Feature	EPYC 7352	Xeon 6515P
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+50%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.8 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	72 MB (total)+125%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	40,370	40,720
Cinebench R23 Multi	32,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,112	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,276	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7352 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6515P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7352 versus 6400 on the Xeon 6515P — the Xeon 6515P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7352) vs 88 (Xeon 6515P) — the EPYC 7352 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7352) and LGA4710 (Xeon 6515P).

Feature	EPYC 7352	Xeon 6515P
Socket	SP3	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6515P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7352) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6515P). Primary use case: EPYC 7352 targets High-density Computing / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7352 rivals Xeon Gold 6242; Xeon 6515P rivals EPYC 9534.

Feature	EPYC 7352	Xeon 6515P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	High-density Computing / Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7352 was priced at $1350, while the Xeon 6515P came in at $740. On launch pricing ($1350 vs $740), Xeon 6515P was $610 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7352 delivers 29.9 pts/$ vs 55.0 pts/$ for the Xeon 6515P — making the Xeon 6515P the 59.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7352	Xeon 6515P
MSRP	$1350	$740-45%
Performance per Dollar	29.9	55.0+84%
Release Date	2019	2025

Search EPYC 7352 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6515P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.