EPYC 7352 vs Xeon W-3275M
EPYC 7352
Xeon W-3275M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7352
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3275M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7352 | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($725) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,449) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7352 | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+513%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($725) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,449) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7352 and Xeon W-3275M
EPYC 7352
The EPYC 7352 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,370 points. Launch price was $1,350.
Xeon W-3275M
The Xeon W-3275M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,419 points. Launch price was $7,453.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7352 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon W-3275M offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3275M has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7352 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275M — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3275M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7352 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon W-3275M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7352 scores 40,370 against the Xeon W-3275M's 40,419 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon W-3275M. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7352 vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275M.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 28 / 56+17% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz+44% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 38.5 MB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 28 MB+5500% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 40,370 | 40,419 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 32,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,112 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,276 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7352 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3275M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7352 versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3275M — the Xeon W-3275M supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7352 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7352) vs 6 (Xeon W-3275M). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7352) vs 64 (Xeon W-3275M) — the EPYC 7352 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7352) and C620 (Xeon W-3275M).
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 2933+73225% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+209715100% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3275M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7352) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3275M). Primary use case: EPYC 7352 targets High-density Computing / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7352 rivals Xeon Gold 6242; Xeon W-3275M rivals EPYC 7742.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-density Computing / Server | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7352 launched at $1350 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3275M debuted at $4449. At current prices ($725 vs $4449), the EPYC 7352 is $3724 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7352 delivers 55.7 pts/$ vs 9.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3275M — making the EPYC 7352 the 143.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1350-70% | $4449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $725-84% | $4449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.7+512% | 9.1 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7352 and Xeon W-3275M
