Core i7-14700 vs EPYC 7352

CPU

GPU

Core i7-14700

20 Cores28 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2024

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7352

24 Cores48 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i7-14700 vs EPYC 7352 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-14700

20 / 28

40,934

+1.4%

40,370

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-14700 vs EPYC 7352 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-14700 vs EPYC 7352: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-14700

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $966 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $1,350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 256.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.6 vs 29.9 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $1,350 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7352, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7352

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-14700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (40,370 vs 40,934).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 106.6 PassMark/$ ($1,350 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-14700 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-14700 better than EPYC 7352?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7352 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-14700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-14700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-14700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-14700 is the better buy right now. Core i7-14700 comes in $966 cheaper on MSRP at $384 MSRP versus $1,350 MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 256.5% better value on MSRP (106.6 vs 29.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-14700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 28 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-14700 vs EPYC 7352 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-14700

The Core i7-14700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 40,934 points. Launch price was $384.

EPYC 7352

The EPYC 7352 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,370 points. Launch price was $1,350.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-14700 packs 20 cores / 28 threads, while the EPYC 7352 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7352 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-14700 versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7352 — a 51.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-14700 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7352 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14700 scores 40,934 against the EPYC 7352's 40,370 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i7-14700. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700 vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7352.

Feature	Core i7-14700	EPYC 7352
Cores / Threads	20 / 28	24 / 48+20%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+69%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.3 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	33 MB (total)+3%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	40,934+1%	40,370
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	32,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,112
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	7,276

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-14700 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7352 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i7-14700 versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7352 — the Core i7-14700 supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7352 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-14700) vs 8 (EPYC 7352). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-14700) vs 128 (EPYC 7352) — the EPYC 7352 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-14700) and SP3,Rome (EPYC 7352).

Feature	Core i7-14700	EPYC 7352
Socket	LGA1700	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5600+75%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-14700) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7352). The Core i7-14700 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7352 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7352 targets High-density Computing / Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-14700 rivals Ryzen 7 7700; EPYC 7352 rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

Feature	Core i7-14700	EPYC 7352
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, SEV
Target Use	—	High-density Computing / Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-14700 was priced at $384, while the EPYC 7352 came in at $1350. On launch pricing ($384 vs $1350), Core i7-14700 was $966 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-14700 delivers 106.6 pts/$ vs 29.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 7352 — making the Core i7-14700 the 112.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-14700	EPYC 7352
MSRP	$384-72%	$1350
Performance per Dollar	106.6+257%	29.9
Release Date	2024	2019

Search Core i7-14700 on Amazon

Search EPYC 7352 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.