Core Ultra 5 245 vs Xeon 6505P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 245 vs Xeon 6505P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 245 vs Xeon 6505P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 245

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $244 less on MSRP ($319 MSRP vs $563 MSRP).
✅Delivers 80.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 69.9 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $563 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics, while Xeon 6505P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6505P, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon 6505P

2025

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (39,341 vs 40,165).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 69.9 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($563 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 245 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 245 better than Xeon 6505P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 6505P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 5 245 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 245 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 245 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 245 is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 5 245 comes in $244 cheaper on MSRP at $319 MSRP versus $563 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 80.2% better value on MSRP (125.9 vs 69.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6505P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core Ultra 5 245 vs Xeon 6505P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 245

The Core Ultra 5 245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,165 points. Launch price was $270.

Xeon 6505P

The Xeon 6505P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 39,341 points. Launch price was $563.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 245 packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon 6505P offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 5 245 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6505P — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon 6505P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245 scores 40,165 against the Xeon 6505P's 39,341 — a 2.1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245 vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon 6505P.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245	Xeon 6505P
Cores / Threads	14 / 14+17%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+24%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+59%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	48 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	3 MB (per core)+50%	2 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm	Intel 3 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	40,165+2%	39,341

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 245 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6505P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 6400 memory speed. The Xeon 6505P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 245) vs 8 (Xeon 6505P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 245) vs 88 (Xeon 6505P) — the Xeon 6505P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245) and LGA4710 (Xeon 6505P).

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245	Xeon 6505P
Socket	LGA1851	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	6400	6400
Max RAM Capacity	256	4096+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	88+340%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6505P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 245 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics), while the Xeon 6505P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245 rivals Ryzen 5 9600X; Xeon 6505P rivals EPYC 9334.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245	Xeon 6505P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core Ultra 5 245 was priced at $319, while the Xeon 6505P came in at $563. On launch pricing ($319 vs $563), Core Ultra 5 245 was $244 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 245 delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 69.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6505P — making the Core Ultra 5 245 the 57.2% better value option.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245	Xeon 6505P
MSRP	$319-43%	$563
Performance per Dollar	125.9+80%	69.9
Release Date	2025	2025

Search Core Ultra 5 245 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6505P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.