PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900E vs Core Ultra 5 245 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900E vs Core Ultra 5 245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900E

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($554 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).

Core Ultra 5 245

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $235 less on MSRP ($319 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
✅Delivers 72.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (40,165 vs 40,476).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900E better than Core Ultra 5 245?

Yes. Core i9-13900E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13900E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900E is still the faster CPU overall, but Core Ultra 5 245 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-13900E comes in 73.7% more expensive on MSRP at $554 MSRP versus $319 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core Ultra 5 245 is also 72.3% better value on MSRP (125.9 vs 73.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1851 + DDR5 setup, Core Ultra 5 245 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 245 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13900E vs Core Ultra 5 245 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900E

The Core i9-13900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,476 points. Launch price was $499.

Core Ultra 5 245

The Core Ultra 5 245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,165 points. Launch price was $270.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900E packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 245 offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Core i9-13900E has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-13900E versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245 — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900E (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-13900E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 245 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900E scores 40,476 against the Core Ultra 5 245's 40,165 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-13900E. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900E vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245.

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Core Ultra 5 245
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+71%	14 / 14
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+2%	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.5 GHz+94%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)+50%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	3 MB (per core)+50%
Process	10 nm	3 nm-70%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark	40,476	40,165
Geekbench 6 Single	2,606	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 245 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900E versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245 — the Core Ultra 5 245 supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 245 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: W680,Q670,Z790,H770 (Core i9-13900E) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245).

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Core Ultra 5 245
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1851
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	6400+14%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	256 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900E) and Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics (Core Ultra 5 245) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245 rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Core Ultra 5 245
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900E was priced at $554, while the Core Ultra 5 245 came in at $319. On launch pricing ($554 vs $319), Core Ultra 5 245 was $235 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900E delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 125.9 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 245 — making the Core Ultra 5 245 the 53.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP	$554	$319-42%
Performance per Dollar	73.1	125.9+72%
Release Date	2023	2025

Search Core i9-13900E on Amazon

Search Core Ultra 5 245 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.