PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900E vs Xeon w5-2545 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900E vs Xeon w5-2545: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900E

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Costs $335 less on MSRP ($554 MSRP vs $889 MSRP).
✅Delivers 59.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 45.9 PassMark/$ ($554 MSRP vs $889 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 210W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (40,476 vs 40,782).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-2545, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon w5-2545

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 36 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.9 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($889 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
❌223.1% higher power demand at 210W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900E better than Xeon w5-2545?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon w5-2545 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-2545 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900E is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900E comes in $335 cheaper on MSRP at $554 MSRP versus $889 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon w5-2545 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 59.3% better value on MSRP (73.1 vs 45.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-2545 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 24/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13900E vs Xeon w5-2545 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900E

The Core i9-13900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,476 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon w5-2545

The Xeon w5-2545 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 40,782 points. Launch price was $889.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900E packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w5-2545 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-13900E has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-13900E versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon w5-2545 — a 10.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900E (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-13900E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon w5-2545 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900E scores 40,476 against the Xeon w5-2545's 40,782 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon w5-2545. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900E vs 30 MB on the Xeon w5-2545.

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Xeon w5-2545
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+100%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+11%	4.7 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.5 GHz+94%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)+20%	30 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	40,476	40,782
Geekbench 6 Single	2,606	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-2545 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900E versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-2545 — the Core i9-13900E supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-2545 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900E) vs 4 (Xeon w5-2545). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900E) vs 64 (Xeon w5-2545) — the Xeon w5-2545 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W680,Q670,Z790,H770 (Core i9-13900E) and W790 (Xeon w5-2545).

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Xeon w5-2545
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+17%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w5-2545 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w5-2545 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i9-13900E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon w5-2545 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Xeon w5-2545 rivals Threadripper 7960X.

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Xeon w5-2545
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900E was priced at $554, while the Xeon w5-2545 came in at $889. On launch pricing ($554 vs $889), Core i9-13900E was $335 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900E delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 45.9 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-2545 — making the Core i9-13900E the 45.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Xeon w5-2545
MSRP	$554-38%	$889
Performance per Dollar	73.1+59%	45.9
Release Date	2023	2024

Search Core i9-13900E on Amazon

Search Xeon w5-2545 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.