Core i9-13900E vs Core i9-13950HX

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900E vs Core i9-13950HX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900E vs Core i9-13950HX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900E

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $36 less on MSRP ($554 MSRP vs $590 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (40,476 vs 41,012).
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.

Core i9-13950HX

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
6.5% HIGHER MSRP
$590 MSRPvs$554 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13950HX better than Core i9-13900E?

Yes. Core i9-13950HX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13950HX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13950HX is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13950HX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i9-13900E is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-13950HX comes in 6.5% more expensive on MSRP at $590 MSRP versus $554 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i9-13900E is also 5.1% better value on MSRP (73.1 vs 69.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13950HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-13900E vs Core i9-13950HX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900E

The Core i9-13900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,476 points. Launch price was $499.

Core i9-13950HX

The Core i9-13950HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,012 points. Launch price was $590.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i9-13900E and Core i9-13950HX share an identical 24-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-13900E versus 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13950HX — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-13950HX (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i9-13900E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i9-13950HX uses Raptor Lake-HX (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900E scores 40,476 against the Core i9-13950HX's 41,012 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i9-13950HX. Both processors carry 36 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Core i9-13950HX
Cores / Threads	24 / 32	24 / 32
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz	5.5 GHz+6%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.2 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	36 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-HX (2023)
PassMark	40,476	41,012+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,606	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-13950HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i9-13950HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: W680,Q670,Z790,H770 (Core i9-13900E) and Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13950HX).

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Core i9-13950HX
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA1964
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	5600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-13950HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-13950HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900E) and Intel UHD Graphics (Core i9-13950HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i9-13950HX rivals M3 Max 16-Core.

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Core i9-13950HX
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	Intel UHD Graphics
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900E was priced at $554, while the Core i9-13950HX came in at $590. On launch pricing ($554 vs $590), Core i9-13900E was $36 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900E delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 69.5 pts/$ for the Core i9-13950HX — making the Core i9-13900E the 5% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Core i9-13950HX
MSRP	$554-6%	$590
Performance per Dollar	73.1+5%	69.5
Release Date	2023	2023

Search Core i9-13900E on Amazon

Search Core i9-13950HX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.