PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900E vs Xeon Gold 6258R FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900E vs Xeon Gold 6258R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900E

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,396 less on MSRP ($554 MSRP vs $3,950 MSRP).
✅Delivers 613.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 10.2 PassMark/$ ($554 MSRP vs $3,950 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6258R, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6258R

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (40,442 vs 40,476).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.2 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($3,950 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900E better than Xeon Gold 6258R?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6258R makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13900E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 22.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900E is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900E comes in $3,396 cheaper on MSRP at $554 MSRP versus $3,950 MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 613.6% better value on MSRP (73.1 vs 10.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 32 threads instead of 28/56. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13900E vs Xeon Gold 6258R Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900E

The Core i9-13900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,476 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Gold 6258R

The Xeon Gold 6258R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,442 points. Launch price was $3,950.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900E packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6258R offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6258R has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-13900E versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6258R — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900E (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i9-13900E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6258R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900E scores 40,476 against the Xeon Gold 6258R's 40,442 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i9-13900E. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900E vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6258R.

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Xeon Gold 6258R
Cores / Threads	24 / 32	28 / 56+17%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+30%	4 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.7 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	38.5 MB+7%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	28 MB+1300%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	40,476	40,442
Geekbench 6 Single	2,606	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6258R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900E versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6258R — the Core i9-13900E supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6258R supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900E) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6258R). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900E) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6258R) — the Xeon Gold 6258R offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W680,Q670,Z790,H770 (Core i9-13900E) and LGA3647 (Xeon Gold 6258R).

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Xeon Gold 6258R
Socket	LGA1700	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+91%	2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6258R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i9-13900E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Gold 6258R requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6258R rivals EPYC 7502.

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Xeon Gold 6258R
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900E was priced at $554, while the Xeon Gold 6258R came in at $3950. On launch pricing ($554 vs $3950), Core i9-13900E was $3396 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900E delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 10.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6258R — making the Core i9-13900E the 150.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP	$554-86%	$3950
Performance per Dollar	73.1+617%	10.2
Release Date	2023	2020

Search Core i9-13900E on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6258R on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.