
Core Ultra 5 245

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Core Ultra 5 245 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 245 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 245 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 245
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $830 less on MSRP ($319 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 262.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (39,929 vs 40,165).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.8 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- ❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 245 moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 245 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 245 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 245 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 245
The Core Ultra 5 245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,165 points. Launch price was $270.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,929 points. Launch price was $1,149.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 245 packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — a 17% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245 scores 40,165 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX's 39,929 — a 0.6% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14 | 16 / 32+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+19% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 64 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Castle Peak (2020) |
| PassMark | 40,165 | 39,929 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 245 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245 versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — the Core Ultra 5 245 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 256 — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 245) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 245) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+100% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 2048+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX). The Core Ultra 5 245 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245 rivals Ryzen 5 9600X; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX rivals Xeon Silver 4314.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 5 245 was priced at $319, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX came in at $1149. On launch pricing ($319 vs $1149), Core Ultra 5 245 was $830 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 245 delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 34.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — making the Core Ultra 5 245 the 113.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $319-72% | $1149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.9+262% | 34.8 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














