
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Popular choices:

Xeon 6740P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +39.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,951 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 414.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.4 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 270W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (2 Cores), while Xeon 6740P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (70,177 vs 90,684).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 288 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6740P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
Xeon 6740P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+29.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9950X3D across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.5 vs 100.4 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌58.8% higher power demand at 270W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
2025Xeon 6740P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +39.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,951 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 414.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.4 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 270W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (2 Cores), while Xeon 6740P needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+29.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (70,177 vs 90,684).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 288 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6740P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9950X3D across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.5 vs 100.4 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌58.8% higher power demand at 270W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9950X3D better than Xeon 6740P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 100 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 849 FPS |
| medium | 725 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 560 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 1097 FPS |
| medium | 1001 FPS | 978 FPS |
| high | 878 FPS | 834 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 702 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 872 FPS | 902 FPS |
| medium | 766 FPS | 777 FPS |
| high | 673 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 551 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 656 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 425 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Xeon 6740P


Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,177 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon 6740P
Xeon 6740P
The Xeon 6740P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 90,684 points. Launch price was $4,650.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6740P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6740P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6740P — a 40% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9950X3D uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6740P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D scores 70,177 against the Xeon 6740P's 90,684 — a 25.5% lead for the Xeon 6740P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740P.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 48 / 96+200% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+50% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+105% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 288 MB (total)+125% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 70,177 | 90,684+29% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 44,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,398 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,206 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6740P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) vs 8 (Xeon 6740P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) vs 88 (Xeon 6740P) — the Xeon 6740P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4 TB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6740P). The Ryzen 9 9950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (2 Cores)), while the Xeon 6740P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6740P targets High-density Compute. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 9950X3D rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Xeon 6740P rivals EPYC 9355P.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | — | High-density Compute |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D launched at $699 MSRP, while the Xeon 6740P debuted at $4650. On MSRP ($699 vs $4650), the Ryzen 9 9950X3D is $3951 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 9950X3D delivers 100.4 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740P — making the Ryzen 9 9950X3D the 134.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-85% | $4650 |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.4+415% | 19.5 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












