Xeon Bronze 3408U vs Xeon E5-2687W

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Bronze 3408U vs Xeon E5-2687W FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Bronze 3408U vs Xeon E5-2687W: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Bronze 3408U

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (9,969 vs 10,036).

Xeon E5-2687W

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,885 MSRP, while Xeon Bronze 3408U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Xeon Bronze 3408U moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2687W better than Xeon Bronze 3408U?

Yes. Xeon E5-2687W is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2687W is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2687W is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2687W is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2687W comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,885 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Bronze 3408U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2012) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon Bronze 3408U vs Xeon E5-2687W Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Bronze 3408U

The Xeon Bronze 3408U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 9,969 points. Launch price was $425.

Xeon E5-2687W

The Xeon E5-2687W is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,036 points. Launch price was $815.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Bronze 3408U packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2687W's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3408U versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2687W (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon Bronze 3408U uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2687W uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Bronze 3408U scores 9,969 against the Xeon E5-2687W's 10,036 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2687W. L3 cache: 22.5 MB on the Xeon Bronze 3408U vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2687W.

Feature	Xeon Bronze 3408U	Xeon E5-2687W
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	8 / 16
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	3.8 GHz+100%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.1 GHz+72%
L3 Cache	22.5 MB+13%	20480 kB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-78%	32 nm
Architecture	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	9,969	10,036

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Bronze 3408U uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2687W uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.