Xeon D-1813NT vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Xeon D-1813NT

4 / 8

7,732

+0.7%

7,677

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon D-1813NT is positioned at rank #386 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon D-1813NT

#1

Xeon Platinum 8454H

MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A

5376%

#6

Xeon Gold 6240R

MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A

1015%

#10

Xeon 6337P

MSRP: $60|Avg: $5

902%

#15

EPYC 9174F

MSRP: $194|Avg: $30

697%

#266

EPYC 7C13

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

99%

#267

Xeon Gold 6336Y

MSRP: $3245|Avg: N/A

98%

#268

Xeon w5-2565X

MSRP: $1389|Avg: $1389

98%

#269

Xeon Silver 4416+

MSRP: $1186|Avg: $1176

96%

#386

Xeon D-1813NT

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#388

Xeon E-2234

MSRP: $250|Avg: $136

100%

#399

Xeon D-1537

MSRP: $470|Avg: $350

96%

#401

Xeon E3-1505M v6

MSRP: $434|Avg: N/A

96%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon D-1813NT is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.

Insight	Xeon D-1813NT	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($149)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Legacy / Standard Node)	✨ Modern (Picasso (2019−2022) / 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE ($149), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($149 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.

Insight	Xeon D-1813NT	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($149)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon D-1813NT Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon D-1813NT and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

Xeon D-1813NT

The Xeon D-1813NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 42 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,732 points. Launch price was $800.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,677 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon D-1813NT and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Xeon D-1813NT versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE — a 50% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is built on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1813NT scores 7,732 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE's 7,677 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon D-1813NT. L3 cache: 10240 kB on the Xeon D-1813NT vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE.

Feature	Xeon D-1813NT	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	4 GHz+67%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.3 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	10240 kB+150%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	512K (per core)
Process	—	12 nm
Architecture	—	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	7,732	7,677

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1813NT uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.