Xeon D-1813NT vs Xeon E5-2620 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1813NT vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1813NT vs Xeon E5-2620 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1813NT

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 42W instead of 85W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2620 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,732 vs 7,734).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 15 MB).

Xeon E5-2620 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 10 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $417 MSRP, while Xeon D-1813NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌102.4% higher power demand at 85W vs 42W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2620 v3 better than Xeon D-1813NT?

Yes. Xeon E5-2620 v3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2620 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2620 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2620 v3 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2620 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $417 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1813NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-1813NT vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-1813NT

The Xeon D-1813NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 42 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,732 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2620 v3

The Xeon E5-2620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,734 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-1813NT packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2620 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Xeon D-1813NT versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v3 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2620 v3 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon E5-2620 v3 is built on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1813NT scores 7,732 against the Xeon E5-2620 v3's 7,734 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-2620 v3. L3 cache: 10240 kB on the Xeon D-1813NT vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2620 v3.

Feature	Xeon D-1813NT	Xeon E5-2620 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3.2 GHz+33%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	10240 kB	15 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	—	256K (per core)
Process	—	22 nm
Architecture	—	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	7,732	7,734

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1813NT uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon D-1813NT	Xeon E5-2620 v3
Socket	FCBGA2227	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity	—	768 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40