Ryzen 5 1400 vs Xeon D-1813NT

Ryzen 5 1400 vs Xeon D-1813NT Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 1400

4 / 8

7,731

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon D-1813NT

4 / 8

7,732

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 1400 vs Xeon D-1813NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 1400 vs Xeon D-1813NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 1400

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,731 vs 7,732).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Xeon D-1813NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌54.8% higher power demand at 65W vs 42W.

Xeon D-1813NT

2023

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 42W instead of 65W, a 23W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 1400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1813NT better than Ryzen 5 1400?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1813NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 1400 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1813NT is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1813NT is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon D-1813NT comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 1400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 7,731 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1813NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 1400 vs Xeon D-1813NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 1400

The Ryzen 5 1400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,731 points. Launch price was $169.

Xeon D-1813NT

The Xeon D-1813NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 42 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,732 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 1400 and Xeon D-1813NT share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 1400 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon D-1813NT — a 34.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 1400 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 1400 is built on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 1400 scores 7,731 against the Xeon D-1813NT's 7,732 — a 0% lead for the Xeon D-1813NT. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 1400 vs 10240 kB on the Xeon D-1813NT.

Feature	Ryzen 5 1400	Xeon D-1813NT
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+42%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+45%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	10240 kB+25%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	—
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	—
PassMark	7,731	7,732

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 1400 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1813NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 1400	Xeon D-1813NT
Socket	AM4	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—