Core i3-10105T vs Ryzen 5 1400

CPU

GPU

Core i3-10105T

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2021

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 5 1400

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i3-10105T vs Ryzen 5 1400 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-10105T

4 / 8

7,815

+1.1%

7,731

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10105T vs Ryzen 5 1400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10105T vs Ryzen 5 1400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10105T

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $47 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 45.7 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 1400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 1400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Ryzen 5 1400

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,731 vs 7,815).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.7 vs 64.1 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10105T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10105T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10105T better than Ryzen 5 1400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 5 1400 is ahead with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10105T pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 1400 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10105T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10105T is the better buy right now. Core i3-10105T comes in $47 cheaper on MSRP at $122 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen 5 1400 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 40.0% better value on MSRP (64.1 vs 45.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 1400 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10105T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-10105T vs Ryzen 5 1400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10105T

The Core i3-10105T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,815 points. Launch price was $134.

Ryzen 5 1400

The Ryzen 5 1400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,731 points. Launch price was $169.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10105T and Ryzen 5 1400 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10105T versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 1400 — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-10105T (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i3-10105T uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 1400 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105T scores 7,815 against the Ryzen 5 1400's 7,731 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-10105T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105T vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 1400.

Feature	Core i3-10105T	Ryzen 5 1400
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+15%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.2 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	7,815+1%	7,731
Geekbench 6 Single	1,200	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10105T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 1400 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Core i3-10105T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-10105T) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 1400) — the Ryzen 5 1400 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Q470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Q570,Z590 (Core i3-10105T) and AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 1400).

Feature	Core i3-10105T	Ryzen 5 1400
Socket	LGA1200	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-10105T) / not specified (Ryzen 5 1400). The Core i3-10105T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 1400 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i3-10105T	Ryzen 5 1400
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-10105T was priced at $122, while the Ryzen 5 1400 came in at $169. On launch pricing ($122 vs $169), Core i3-10105T was $47 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10105T delivers 64.1 pts/$ vs 45.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 1400 — making the Core i3-10105T the 33.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-10105T	Ryzen 5 1400
MSRP	$122-28%	$169
Performance per Dollar	64.1+40%	45.7
Release Date	2021	2017

Search Core i3-10105T on Amazon

Search Ryzen 5 1400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.