Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E3-1285 v4

Intel

Core i3-10105T

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2021
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1285 v4

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E3-1285 v4 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E3-1285 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E3-1285 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10105T

2021

Why buy it

  • +1% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $434 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $556 MSRP).
  • Delivers 360.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $556 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1285 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon E3-1285 v4

2015

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (7,735 vs 7,815).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 64.1 PassMark/$ ($556 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
  • 171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10105T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10105T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10105T better than Xeon E3-1285 v4?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1285 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-10105T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10105T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-10105T is the better buy right now. Core i3-10105T comes in $434 cheaper on MSRP at $122 MSRP versus $556 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1285 v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 360.5% better value on MSRP (64.1 vs 13.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10105T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E3-1285 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-10105T

The Core i3-10105T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,815 points. Launch price was $134.

Intel

Xeon E3-1285 v4

The Xeon E3-1285 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,735 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10105T and Xeon E3-1285 v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10105T versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1285 v4 — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-10105T (base: 3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-10105T uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses Broadwell-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105T scores 7,815 against the Xeon E3-1285 v4's 7,735 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-10105T. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i3-10105TXeon E3-1285 v4
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+3%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
3.5 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake-R (2021)
Broadwell-DT (2015)
PassMark
7,815+1%
7,735
Geekbench 6 Single
1,200
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10105T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-10105TXeon E3-1285 v4
Socket
LGA1200
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-10105T) / not specified (Xeon E3-1285 v4). The Core i3-10105T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i3-10105TXeon E3-1285 v4
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-10105T was priced at $122, while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 came in at $556. On launch pricing ($122 vs $556), Core i3-10105T was $434 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10105T delivers 64.1 pts/$ vs 13.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1285 v4 — making the Core i3-10105T the 128.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-10105TXeon E3-1285 v4
MSRP
$122-78%
$556
Performance per Dollar
64.1+361%
13.9
Release Date
2021
2015

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.