
Core i3-10105T

Opteron 6348
Core i3-10105T vs Opteron 6348 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-10105T vs Opteron 6348 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-10105T vs Opteron 6348: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-10105T
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $453 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 369.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 115W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Opteron 6348 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6348 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,815 vs 7,850).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6348, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads.
Opteron 6348
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 64.1 PassMark/$ ($575 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
- ❌228.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10105T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10105T.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 6348 better than Core i3-10105T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10105T vs Opteron 6348 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10105T
The Core i3-10105T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,815 points. Launch price was $134.

Opteron 6348
The Opteron 6348 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,850 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i3-10105T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6348 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Opteron 6348 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10105T versus 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6348 — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-10105T (base: 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i3-10105T uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6348 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105T scores 7,815 against the Opteron 6348's 7,850 — a 0.4% lead for the Opteron 6348. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105T vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6348.
| Feature | Core i3-10105T | Opteron 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 12 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+15% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+7% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 12 MB+4700% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-R (2021) | Abu Dhabi (2012) |
| PassMark | 7,815 | 7,850 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,200 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-10105T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6348 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-10105T | Opteron 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-10105T) / not specified (Opteron 6348). The Core i3-10105T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 6348 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i3-10105T | Opteron 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-10105T was priced at $122, while the Opteron 6348 came in at $575. On launch pricing ($122 vs $575), Core i3-10105T was $453 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10105T delivers 64.1 pts/$ vs 13.7 pts/$ for the Opteron 6348 — making the Core i3-10105T the 129.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-10105T | Opteron 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $122-79% | $575 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.1+368% | 13.7 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















