Core i3-10105T vs Core i3-10300T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10105T vs Core i3-10300T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10105T vs Core i3-10300T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10105T

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $35 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $157 MSRP).
✅Delivers 27.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 50.2 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $157 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,200 vs 1,313).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (4,000 vs 4,090).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Core i3-10300T

2020

Why buy it

✅+9.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 50.2 vs 64.1 PassMark/$ ($157 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10300T better than Core i3-10105T?

Yes. Core i3-10300T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.3% better Geekbench multi-core, and 0.8% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-10300T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10300T is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10300T is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i3-10105T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i3-10300T comes in 28.7% more expensive on MSRP at $157 MSRP versus $122 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-10105T is also 27.6% better value on MSRP (64.1 vs 50.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10105T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10105T vs Core i3-10300T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10105T

The Core i3-10105T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,815 points. Launch price was $134.

Core i3-10300T

The Core i3-10300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,879 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10105T and Core i3-10300T share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10105T versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10300T — identical boost frequencies (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-10105T is built on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-10105T scores 7,815 against the Core i3-10300T's 7,879 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-10300T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,200 vs 1,313, a 9% lead for the Core i3-10300T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 4,000 vs 4,090 (2.2% advantage for the Core i3-10300T). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105T vs 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i3-10300T.

Feature	Core i3-10105T	Core i3-10300T
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB Intel® Smart Cache+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	—
PassMark	7,815	7,879
Geekbench 6 Single	1,200	1,313+9%
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,000	4,090+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Q470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Q570,Z590 (Core i3-10105T) and LGA1200 (Core i3-10300T).

Feature	Core i3-10105T	Core i3-10300T
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i3-10105T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10300T). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-10105T) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-10300T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i3-10105T	Core i3-10300T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-10105T was priced at $122, while the Core i3-10300T came in at $157. On launch pricing ($122 vs $157), Core i3-10105T was $35 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10105T delivers 64.1 pts/$ vs 50.2 pts/$ for the Core i3-10300T — making the Core i3-10105T the 24.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-10105T	Core i3-10300T
MSRP	$122-22%	$157
Performance per Dollar	64.1+28%	50.2
Release Date	2021	2020

Search Core i3-10105T on Amazon

Search Core i3-10300T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.