
Core i3-10105T

Xeon X7350
Core i3-10105T vs Xeon X7350 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-10105T vs Xeon X7350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-10105T vs Xeon X7350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-10105T
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon X7350 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon X7350.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,815 vs 7,836).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X7350, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Xeon X7350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon X7350
2007Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10105T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10105T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10105T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-10105T better than Xeon X7350?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10105T vs Xeon X7350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10105T
The Core i3-10105T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,815 points. Launch price was $134.

Xeon X7350
The Xeon X7350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Tigerton (2007) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,836 points. Launch price was $2,301.
Processing Power
The Core i3-10105T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X7350 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon X7350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10105T versus 0.93 GHz on the Xeon X7350 — a 123% clock advantage for the Core i3-10105T (base: 3 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Core i3-10105T uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X7350 uses Tigerton (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105T scores 7,815 against the Xeon X7350's 7,836 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon X7350. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105T vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X7350.
| Feature | Core i3-10105T | Xeon X7350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+319% | 0.93 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+2% | 2.93 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB L2 Cache+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4 MB (total)+1500% |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-R (2021) | Tigerton (2007) |
| PassMark | 7,815 | 7,836 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,200 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-10105T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X7350 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-10105T versus DDR2-667 on the Xeon X7350 — the Core i3-10105T supports 299.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-10105T) vs 4 (Xeon X7350). Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Q470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Q570,Z590 (Core i3-10105T) and Intel 7300 (Xeon X7350).
| Feature | Core i3-10105T | Xeon X7350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | PGA604 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+300% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (Core i3-10105T) vs VT-x (Xeon X7350). The Core i3-10105T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon X7350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X7350 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7350 rivals Core i3-2100.
| Feature | Core i3-10105T | Xeon X7350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














