Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E-2314

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E-2314 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E-2314: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10105T

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E-2314 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E-2314.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Xeon E-2314 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E-2314

2021

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,779 vs 7,815).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10105T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10105T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10105T better than Xeon E-2314?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2314 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-10105T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10105T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10105T is the better buy right now. Core i3-10105T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $122 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E-2314 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (64.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10105T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-10105T vs Xeon E-2314 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10105T

The Core i3-10105T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,815 points. Launch price was $134.

Xeon E-2314

The Xeon E-2314 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 7,779 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10105T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E-2314's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10105T versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2314 — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2314 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i3-10105T uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2314 uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105T scores 7,815 against the Xeon E-2314's 7,779 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-10105T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105T vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2314.

Feature	Core i3-10105T	Xeon E-2314
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4.5 GHz+15%
Base Clock	3 GHz+7%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	7,815	7,779
Geekbench 6 Single	1,200	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i3-10105T	Xeon E-2314
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-10105T) / not specified (Xeon E-2314). The Core i3-10105T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E-2314 requires a dedicated GPU.