Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-10810U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-10810U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-10810U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10105T

2021

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i7-10810U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-10810U.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10810U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,815 vs 7,987).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Core i7-10810U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.

Core i7-10810U

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10105T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10105T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10810U better than Core i3-10105T?

Yes. Core i7-10810U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 31.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-10810U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 31.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-10810U is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-10810U is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i3-10105T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-10810U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $122 MSRP, and it still gives you a 31.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-10105T is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (64.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10105T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10105T vs Core i7-10810U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10105T

The Core i3-10105T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,815 points. Launch price was $134.

Core i7-10810U

The Core i7-10810U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,987 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10105T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-10810U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-10810U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10105T versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-10810U — a 22.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-10810U (base: 3 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i3-10105T uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-10810U uses Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105T scores 7,815 against the Core i7-10810U's 7,987 — a 2.2% lead for the Core i7-10810U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105T vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-10810U.

Feature	Core i3-10105T	Core i7-10810U
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4.9 GHz+26%
Base Clock	3 GHz+173%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)
PassMark	7,815	7,987+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,200	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10105T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-10810U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-10105T	Core i7-10810U
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-10105T) / not specified (Core i7-10810U). The Core i3-10105T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-10810U requires a dedicated GPU.